December 4, 2012
The people of Xinjiang

Apartment Brussels, which is larger than Alaska, occupies one-sixth of China. Its name means “new frontier” in Mandarin, the chief language of China’s dominant Han people. Ninety-four percent of all Chinese are Han. Still, with a population of about a billion, China has enough ethnic peoples to equal the populations of New York, Illinois, Ohio, and California. In Xinjiang, China’s back door to the Soviet Union, the Han are outnumbered. In this region of 11 million live a dozen ethnic groups. Most, like the 5.5 million Uygur (wee-gor) and the 800,000 Kazaks, are Muslim and of Turkic origin. THROUGHOUT HISTORY the Han Chinese has regarded the people of Xinjiang as barbarians. Even though the Han constituted only 5 percent of Xinjiang’s population before liberation, they ruled the province either through force or manipulation of its ethnic groups. But in the 1950s the Han began to change their ratio in Xinjiang. They sent colonists en masse into the region, both to ease population pressures in the east and to stabilize and fortify their sensitive borders with the Soviet Union. Also, many former Red Guards were rusticated to Xinjiang after 1968 to defuse their energies. More than four million Han now live in Xinjiang. Predictably, this influx aroused resentment and has sparked occasional violence among the minorities. So did the Cultural Revolution’s eager push to wipe out old customs and cultures. Today the Chinese Government is making serious efforts to placate and promote its minorities. Ethnic languages are being fostered. Minority children are often given special educational privileges. Young minority couples are allowed to marry earlier than the ages sanctioned for the Han Chinese�usually 23 for women and 26 for men. They are also exempt from birth-control pressures that encourage Han couples to have only one child. Arzigal, director of the Urumqi Carpet Factory, exemplifies China’s minority�s policy, similar to affirmative action in the United States. She is a”diligent worker,” we are told. She is young, female, and, in a factory that is 80 percent Han, she is Uygur. Therefore, the party selected her to be the 300-worker factory’s titular head. “Most of our patterns come from Hotan [Khotan] in the Taklimakan Desert,” says Arzigal. “There the people begin learning their skill when they are 7 years old.” However, the Han workers in Arzigal’s factory learn to weave in only three months. Yang Zhongfen, who has been working here for four years, says it takes her about a month on her large handloom to weave one square meter of carpet. Does she like what she does? “I wanted to be in the PLA [People’s Liberation Army], but the government told me to be a worker.So I said I would love to be a worker.” Then, she adds with a grin, “Once you have your job, you love your job.” I LIKE LANZHOU, Urumqi has become an industrial city, growing from 80,000 in the 1940s to about a million. Nondescript new buildings and factories have obscured whatever charm or architectural interest the city may have had.

November 27, 2012
WISH UPON A STAR

The sun holds such bright promise as a clean, renewable energy source. And yet for years, it’s remained out of reach, clean, yet too expensive. So the question is: do we follow the sun or just turn out the lights and go home?

October 13, 2012
The ruling class will not give up power.

antisocial-socialist:

As Trotsky says, “No devil ever yet voluntarily cut off his own claws.” Pacifism isn’t the answer.

I’m not a pascifist, but I’m unset about impossibilism. What are your thoughts on major civil disobedience? I’m not talking about just causing a nuisance, but actual actions that essentially shut down an entire country e.g. universal wildcat striking and lockouts. Do you think it’d ever be possible to simply give the state no other option than to relinquish power, without violent action?

October 13, 2012
Swastikas Used To Be a Symbol of Peace!

Shut the fuck up. Yes, they were, yes, it is still used by Jainism today, possibly the most peaceful religion ever.

But guess what? IT WAS ALSO USED BY THE NAZIS

Don’t fucking use swastikas in inflammatory places. You are not using at as a symbol of peace. You are throwing them around to troll people and then claim its free speech. Just because you have free speech, doesn’t mean you have to use it.

If you’re wearing a Jainist T Shirt, for example, fine fucking go for it. But don’t use the symbol of the worst atrocity ever committed like its no fucking deal and then go all LOLUMADBRO IZ PEACE because, shock, YOU ARE NOT FUCKING USING IT AS A SYMBOL OF PEACE. YOU’RE EITHER A FASCIST OR YOU ARE ‘TROLLING’ IN THE MOST OFFENSIVE WAY POSSIBLE.
SHUT THE FUCK UP.

WANT A SYMBOL OF PEACE? USE A DOVE OR A CND LOGO BUT DON’T GET PISSY WHEN PEOPLE CALL YOU OUT FOR SHITTING ON THE MEMORY OF THE WORST HUMAN CRIME OF THE 20TH CENTURY

October 13, 2012
“Misandry doesn’t exist!” said the angry 12 year old female blogger.

fuckyeahgenderstudies:

sugaredvenom:

electronicsatellite:

So Tumblr, normally I can take insults pretty well but a recent happening (of about an hour ago) has really made my blood boil.

So I’m walking in town by myself, and a woman who was about 20 was walking in front of me. We turn a few of the same corners, so it’s obvious we’re going to the same place.

But then I realise that she keeps looking over her shoulder at me. And then she sped up a little, clinging to her bag.

It came to my attention she thought I was going to attack her.

To test my theory, I sped up a little. She noticed and sped up even more until she was practically jogging.

Now here’s a few details:

Me: Overweight 17 year old boy wearing shorts and a t-shirt with Cookie Monster on it.

Her: 20 year old woman wearing high heels and has a bag

Time of day: 2pm

Clearly I looked threatening and was going to attack her.

Inspired by the “Racism in America” youtube videos, I decided to have a little fun.

I kept picking up my pace, she kept turning around, noticing I had sped up, and in turn did the same.

Then, after making sure she was looking I suddenly started into a sprint and when I was about 3 foot away from her she screamed.

And then I ran straight past her.

I didn’t get to ser her face as I ran past, but I hoping she was incredibly embarrassed.

In retrospect, I probably should have asked her for her Social Justic blog URL…

Misandry doesn’t exist apparently, isn’t that right Tumblr?

How the fuck is that misandry??

How is scaring a young woman proof of misandry??

Also why the fuck do you think how you look changes the likelihood of whether you’re an attacker or not?? I’m telling you right now, not one of the men who raped me ever fit any stereotype of a rapist.

You should be fucking ashamed of yourself. 

I just posted about this on facebook. I notice that the OP has deleted his blog, so presumably he won’t even read this. That’s okay—i don’t really think he deserves any more attention.

I also don’t have an awful lot to add that others haven’t already said. This boy treats women like playthings and the threat of sexual assault like it’s a game. He’s self-centred. He’s arrogant. He’s a sadist who uses women’s fear not only for direct self-gratification, he also distorts that fear into an invented response (“misandry”) that vindicates his holding fucked up core beliefs about sexism and gender violence. What a hero. So, let’s forget him. Not worth my time to flog a dead horse.

What i want to do is ask of my readers, particularly my readers who are men, the following question:

If you were walking behind a woman on the street and she was acting nervous about your presence, what would you think and how would you respond to that?

“I’m a fucking creep, therefore misandry

As a man, if I genuinely think I’m scaring someone by walking behind them, I’ll try to walk slower so there’s a larger gap, or if there’s time/in a safe space stop completely and pretend to mess on my phone or something. If there’s another side passage or something, I might just change direction and go somewhere else completely.

October 13, 2012

obliquecity:

now-heres-a-spoiler-for-you:

I can only imagine what hes saying.
hey guys&. hey guys. Dis guy is my best fran. Bibi Youre drunk thats- Shuddup! Hes my best fran& &. This is strange.
Look at his tieless neck. LOOK AT IT! THE BARBARIC FIEND.

wow nvm this is my favorite bibi edit

obliquecity:

now-heres-a-spoiler-for-you:

I can only imagine what he’s saying.

“hey guys…. hey guys. Dis guy is my best fran.” “Bibi You’re drunk that’s—- “Shuddup! He’s my best fran…” “…. This is strange.”

“Look at his tieless neck. LOOK AT IT! THE BARBARIC FIEND.”

wow nvm this is my favorite bibi edit

October 13, 2012

aburnleyfarmerandbessy:

Well at least were a step in the right direction. Except now Stalin still is used to represent all Socialists :(

aburnleyfarmerandbessy:

Well at least we’re a step in the right direction. Except now Stalin still is used to represent all Socialists :(

October 13, 2012
Abstinence Only Education Misses the Point

bush-is-back:

ragingsocialist:

The ‘reasoning’ behind abstinence only ed is that if you learn how to actually have sex safely, you will have sex. Ignoring the faulty logic and that abstinence education doesn’t prevent any sex anyway, let’s examine the idea that having safe sex is bad.

If someone is having safe, protected sex, then where’s the issue? The main two problems with sex (pregnancy and STDs) have had their chances MASSIVELY reduced. Teaching people how to use contraception properly means that the risks are so incredibly small.

I’d much rather my 15 year old kids be having safe, protected sex than going out drinking at night. Seriously. Contraception works, that’s the point. Condoms reduce your chance of pregnancy by 98%.  Drinking causes literally thousands of deaths a year, and tens of deaths per day. If worst comes to worst anyway, there are still ways to prevent or terminate the pregnancy (plan B, abortion) but obviously right-wing locos don’t like those either.

So basically it’s circular logic. We don’t like you having sex because it has bad consequences. So in order to stop you having sex, we’re going to make these consequences massively worse.

This is why I don’t want children to learn about sex at all.

October 13, 2012
Suspended from Twitter for ‘aggressive following’… After 5 tweets.

Yep. As some of you may have seen, I set up a twitter yesterday. I poked around on it a bit. It was nice and fun, and I tweeted twice (once about religion, once about May Day), set a non-spamming, non-inflaming @reply, and retweeted two things. Then I found out this morning, I got suspended.

Why?

‘following users to aggressively’

PETOHUOEIJLDSKLFJWENKSLAFXADNFWEWHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT

So apparently a ‘disproportionately large number of the users you followed have blocked your account or reported your account as spam’ so obviously I have received a suspension.

What the fuck is this supposed to mean? It won’t tell me how many people I was following (it unfollowed everyone upon suspension) and it won’t tell me WHAT proportion has blocked/reported me.

Bearing in mind, I had 5 tweets. None of these were spam, and I had posted pretty much exactly the same thing on my person account aswell so it wasn’t like I was breaking any rules - so if anyone reported me for spam, they were breaking Twitter rules themselves.

Now I was following, ~40-45 people from what I can remember. About ~30 of these were news sites who don’t give a fuck who follows them, ~5 were people I agree with, and ~5 were EDL fanboys or wankers who I followed. Why the fuck was I even blocked? If that 5 blocked me, ~15% of the people blocked me, and all of them were obviously just blocking me because they were politically different, not because I was being a cunt.

Is Twitter that ridiculous you can be banned just because people don’t like you?

I understand why there’s a policy, but I wasn’t looked at individually, I was just automatically suspended, without people actually thinking WHO had blocked me, or more importantly, WHY.

Does this also mean if I just follow more people in total I wouldn’t have been banned?

Now this isn’t a classical suspension, it’s more of a warning, all I have to do is tick a box promising to be nice, and I’ll be slapped on the wrist and told not to do it again. I’m going to unsuspend myself and just keep going. I’m also going to e-mail Twitter and say that I wasn’t spamming, I had done 5 tweets, and although I understand the rules, if anyone reported me for spamming, I wasn’t and they need to be punished for abusing the system.

If I do get permabanned for ‘aggressively following’ people then fuck that shit I’m staying on Tumblr.

October 13, 2012

amodernmanifesto:

unhistorical:

How to Spot a Communist

In recognizing a communist, physical appearance counts for nothing. If he openly declares himself a communist, we take his word for it. 

If she lurks the #communism tag on Tumblr, she may be a communist!

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »